Evaluating the quality of dialogical argumentation in CSCL: moving beyond an analysis of formal structure
نویسندگان
چکیده
Douglas Clark, College of Education, Payne 203F, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-0911, USA, [email protected], Victor Sampson, College of Education, Payne 203F, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-0911, USA, [email protected] Armin Weinberger, Ludwig-Maximilans-Universität, Leopoldstr. 13, 80802 Munich, Germany, [email protected], Gijsbert Erkens, Research Centre Learning in Interaction, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS Utrecht, NL, [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Understanding elementary students' emergent dialogical argumentation in science
This paper explores the use of Engle and Conant’s (2002) theoretical framework of productive disciplinary engagement to describe a group of fifth-graders’ emergent dialogical argumentation about a rocky seashore ecosystem that was triggered by fieldwork activities. Engle and Conant’s theoretical framework was mapped onto Weinberger and Fischer’s (2006) multi-dimensional conceptual framework for...
متن کاملAnalysis of Dialogical Argumentation via Finite State Machines
Dialogical argumentation is an important cognitive activity by which agents exchange arguments and counterarguments as part of some process such as discussion, debate, persuasion and negotiation. Whilst numerous formal systems have been proposed, there is a lack of frameworks for implementing and evaluating these proposals. First-order executable logic has been proposed as a general framework f...
متن کاملReasons and Options for Updating an Opponent Model in Persuasion Dialogues
Dialogical argumentation allows agents to interact by constructing and evaluating arguments through a dialogue. Numerous proposals have been made for protocols for dialogical argumentation, and recently there is interest in developing better strategies for agents to improve their own outcomes from the interaction by using an opponent model to guide their strategic choices. However, there is a l...
متن کاملOn the nature of argument schemes
Since the 1980s, computer science, especially artificial intelligence (AI) has developed formal models of many aspects of argumentation that since the work of Toulmin and Perelman were thought of as belonging to informal logic. Doug Walton is one of the argumentation theorists who has recognised the relevance of this body of work for argumentation theory. One of the concepts on which recent wor...
متن کاملHalf-metallic properties of KP compound in a bulk and (001) surface of rock-salt structure: A b-initio study
Given the many applications of half-metals in the spintronics devices, we investigated the half-metallic properties of the KP compound in rock-salt (RS) and cesium chloride (CsCl) structural phases by using density functional theory. The results indicated that the KP compound as the half-metal in the RS structure, in contrast to the CsCl structure, due to the small lattice constant and failure ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007